Thursday, May 7, 2009

le sigh

i am now a brunette again. hooray! i feel like a completely new person even though i've only been blond since last september. my bf doesn't know i changed it up. he will be so surprised (evil laugh). and so will my co-workers who have only known me as a blond. the haircut is very catherine zeta jones in chicago.

WHAT IS UP WITH THE ANONYMOUS COMMENT IN MY LAST POST???


seriously? i shouldn't be wearing short shorts at age 27? number one, that's the dumbest thing i've ever heard. number two, jealousy is a very unattractive quality. zing! number three, anonymous comments are so lame. insults without real people to back them up are meaningless and number four, even stacey and clinton say you can wear miniskirts until age 35, and the only difference between a miniskirt and a pair of short shorts is a little flap of material. AND number five, i never felt comfortable wearing short shorts until i was about 25 years old so you better believe i'm going to work it as long as i can. so there. i think i've made my point.

to the rest of you with nice questions and comments, here are my answers:

1) no, i didn't have to keep moistening the strap. it just worked all day (and night!) i did wear an old sort of loosey sports bra to bed, just to make sure it didn't slip out of place.

2) my daily burn is less than the average woman's (i think) for a few reasons. number one, i just don't think my metabolism is that fast. ever since puberty i've had a problem with weight gain. (this runs in my family as well.) if i even look at or smell a chocolate chip muffin i seem to be heavier. not joking. also, it seems like some of my friends can eat a lot more than me and put on weight slower. these are really good friends that i know well (and know their eating habits well), not those people who eat a lot in public and then are very diligent about watching their food in private. also, number two, i am quite light (now that i've lost weight) so obviously in my natural day-to-day movements i don't need as much energy to move around and that means less calories and less food.

3) trying out a hrm for a whole day is AWESOME! i have come to peace with the numbers - they really aren't THAT bad, especially when i compare the calories of my daily points to what i'm apparently burning.

4) i also prefer writing my points down in a book. my book is so little and cute too - fits in my purse and sits on my desk at work without looking conspicuous.

5) everyone's metabolism rate is different based on genetics (inherited metabolism), age, sex, weight, height, activity level... blah blah blah. that's why in weight watchers, the heavier you are, the more points you get. and then when you are me and want to drop a few pounds that you gained, you are stuck with 18 points a day which is inhuman and impossible if you are working out or doing any activity other than sitting all day.

6) i wonder if i have a thyroid problem. since right now i am able to control my weight (somewhat) i won't get it checked, but that's something to think about in the future.

now i have a VERY interesting question. maybe someone knows the answer. apparently, the average resting heart rate for a woman is about 70 beats per minute. mine is 58 - that's very slow. now apparently, the more athletic you are (the more you've worked out especially with cardio), the slower your heart rate is. now, slow is good because it means your heart does not have to work as hard to keep your blood pumping HOWEVER a fast heart rate burns more calories. so as someone with an athletic heart rate, does that mean i am burning fewer calories because my heart beats slower than your average bear? riddle me that! AND i know that having more muscle speeds up your metabolism because a pound of muscle burns 50 times more calories than a pound of fat, but does having more muscle affect your heart rate at all? how would my heart rate monitor detect muscle mass? i don't think it can, but it definitely is raising some questions that make my brain hurt!

now i have to vacuum my apartment. JOY!

9 comments:

Randi said...

I agree all over the place.

Especially with those brain hurtin' questions. Yes an "athlete" would have a lower HR, and yet have a higher caloric burn due to muscles. I just don't think HRM or anything can really calculate calories that precisely anyway. It's all just math trying to match biology, just doesn't work that great (our bodies are not computers).

I want to see brunette pictures!

Lainey said...

Okay, first of all, I hope you haven't acquired a troll. Anonymous sounds trollish.

Secondly, I'll be 31 in August, and once I hit a weight that I'm happy with, I will be definitely wearing short shorts. I don't care what Anonymous OR Stacy and Clinton say! LOL!

Third, I also want to see brunette pictures!

SeaBreeze said...

I'm spring cleaning my apartment tonight too. Wonder how many calories that burns...?

Cat_82 said...

I betcha your annonymous person is the same annonymous person who made the stupif comment on my blog about how I NEVER smile...apparently. Sooo dumb, because I clearly smile, and you clearly CAN wear short shorts with your body at 27! I'm 27 and I'd wear short shorts if I could...

Rock those shorts lady...in fact, just to piss that person off, I think you should walk around in undies.....

fittingbackin said...

I’m officially tired… I was reading your post and laughing at your response to anon (TOTAL, GIRL!) and was reading #5 and did a double take. I thought you said metabolisms were different based on sexual activity! Haha Sorry, I’m a 12-year-old boy. Anyway – great post! And I’m not help, as usual, I don’t know my resting heart rate or the impact it has or what it means, etc. I suck.

P.S. I love that you have a tag for "I Know You Didn't" haha

Jen said...

My head hurts from all the information in that post!! (in a good way!!!)

Thanks for all the answers!!! You are most helpful!!!

and...

"who wears short shorts??
Eury wears short shorts!' ANNNNNND she looks friggin stellar doing so!!!

hk said...

rock your short shorts, especially with stacey and clinton to back you up!! :)

Sarah said...

Wow. that last question made my brain hurt!! I'd love to know the answers though!!

Fatinah said...

I think as an "athlete" you would burn more calories because you likely have more muscle mass than fat.... so you're good to go!